Content
87%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is concise, actionable, and well-organized with executable safe-start commands and a clear command table. Its main weakness is the absence of an explicit feedback loop for destructive operations, which caps workflow clarity.
Suggestions
Add an explicit validate-fix-retry feedback loop for writes and deletes, e.g. 'Run with --dry-run; on errors, review the JSON output, fix the inputs, and re-run before committing the live write.'
Show a short end-to-end example for one common destructive action (e.g. creating a course or announcement) to make the write workflow concrete.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and efficient with no padded explanations of concepts Claude already knows; every line (safe-start commands, flag guidance, command table) earns its place, matching the lean-and-efficient anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | It provides copy-paste-ready executable commands ('gog auth list --check --json --no-input', 'gog schema classroom --json') plus a concrete command table, and explicitly defers flag details to '--help'/'schema' rather than guessing syntax, matching fully executable guidance. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A safe-start sequence and validation cues ('--dry-run before supported writes', 'Confirm the exact account, object, and mutation before any write or delete') are present, but there is no explicit validate-then-fix-then-retry feedback loop for destructive writes/deletes, which caps workflow clarity at 2. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is under 50 lines with well-organized sections and a single one-level-deep, clearly signaled reference to '../gog/SKILL.md' for shared rules, matching the simple-skill note that allows a score of 3 for clear, well-organized content. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |