Content
82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
An exemplary lean, security-conscious workflow: concrete executable commands, explicit safety flags, and a defined output contract (four buckets with required fields). The only notable gaps are the missing draft-creation command in step 5 and the absence of failure-path guidance.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The ~30-line body contains zero padding and no explanations of concepts Claude already knows — every line is either a command, a guardrail, or a concrete output requirement. Matches anchor 5 (lean, every token earns its place). | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Steps 1–3 are fully executable, copy-paste-ready commands with concrete flags (--readonly, --gmail-no-send, --max 25, --wrap-untrusted). Step 5 (draft creation) is the only write operation yet gives no concrete command, leaving a minor gap that keeps it at anchor 4 rather than 5. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 1–5 sequence with an explicit pre-flight checkpoint ("Verify auth without prompting") and safety gates (read-only inspection, never send during triage). However, there is no failure-path guidance (e.g., what to do if auth fails or search returns nothing), so it fits anchor 4 (most checkpoints present, minor validation gaps) rather than 5's explicit feedback loops. No destructive/batch cap applies since the workflow is read-only apart from a gated draft creation. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines, well organized as a numbered workflow, and the two references (../gog/SKILL.md, ../gog-gmail/SKILL.md) are clearly signaled one level deep at the top. Scored against the actual bundle structure (no references/, scripts/, or assets/ directories), the body's first instruction depends on sibling files not present in this bundle — a minor organization gap that keeps it at 4 rather than 5. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |