CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

gog-people

Google People operations through gog.

55

Quality

69%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide
SecuritybySnyk

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./.agents/skills/gog-people/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is a model of lean, actionable skill writing: executable startup commands, explicit safety gates for writes, and a tight command table with pointers to --help and schema for detail. Its only gaps are a missing worked example with arguments for the main read commands and the absence of an explicit error-recovery loop.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is lean and efficient: a short safe-start command block, a compact rules list, and a command table — no explanations of concepts Claude already knows and no padding. Every token earns its place.

5 / 5

Actionability

The safe-start block gives copy-paste-ready executable commands and the table maps each subcommand to its purpose, with pointers to --help and schema for flags. Not 5 — no full invocation example with arguments (e.g. 'gog people search <query>' or 'get <id>') is shown for the read commands.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

There is a clear sequence (read shared gog rules first, then auth check, schema, and a readonly identity probe) and write safety checkpoints ('--dry-run before supported writes', 'Confirm the exact account, object, and mutation before any write or delete'). Not 5 — no explicit validate-and-retry feedback loop is described.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

The skill is under 50 lines with no bundle files and well-organized sections, and its one external reference ('../gog/SKILL.md' for shared rules) is clearly signaled and one level deep — matching the simple-skill exception.

5 / 5

Total

18

/

20

Passed

Description

40%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description identifies a clear niche but is minimal to a fault: it names the domain and tool without stating any concrete capability or when the skill should be used. It functions more as a label than as a trigger.

Suggestions

Add a 'Use when...' clause with concrete triggers, e.g. 'Use when looking up user profiles, searching the Workspace directory, or listing a user's relations.'

Name the concrete capabilities (get a profile by ID, show your own profile, search the directory, list relations) instead of the generic 'operations'.

Include natural trigger terms users would say — contacts, directory, profile, org relationships — and the API name (People API) to broaden keyword coverage.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

The description names the domain ("Google People operations") but includes no concrete action verbs — "operations" is generic. It is above anchor 1 because the domain is explicitly named, but below anchor 3 because no specific capability (get profiles, search directory) is stated.

2 / 5

Completeness

It has only a vague "what" ("operations" says nothing about what is actually done) and no "when" — no "Use when..." clause or equivalent trigger guidance exists, which alone caps this dimension at 3; the vague what pushes it to anchor 2.

2 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

"Google People" and "gog" are relevant keywords, but common natural variations users would say are missing (contacts, directory, profile, lookup, colleagues). Not 4 — keyword coverage is limited to two terms with no synonyms or API extensions.

3 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The niche is clear (People API operations via the gog CLI) with minimal conflict risk from unrelated skills. Not 5 — it could overlap with sibling gog-* skills or generic Google contacts skills, and no trigger phrases are provided to sharpen the boundary.

4 / 5

Total

11

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

referenced_paths_exist

Referenced path issues: 1 missing

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
openclaw/gogcli
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.