Content
80%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is concise and highly actionable with concrete executable commands and a clear command table, but it leans on an external parent skill and help/schema endpoints rather than embedding or locally referencing validation workflows, capping workflow clarity and progressive disclosure at 2.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean with no concept explanations Claude already knows; every line is a concrete flag, command, or safety rule that earns its place, matching the score-3 anchor for lean, efficient content. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | It provides fully executable commands (e.g. `gog auth list --check --json --no-input`, `gog schema photos --json`), a command table with specific purposes, and explicit flag guidance, matching the score-3 anchor for copy-paste-ready instructions. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The "Safe start" section sequences setup steps, but for a tool that performs writes/deletes there are no explicit validate-then-proceed checkpoints in the body itself; the validation guidance is deferred to the parent skill and to `--dry-run`, so per the rubric feedback-loop guidance workflow clarity caps at 2. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | It points one level up to `../gog/SKILL.md` for shared rules and to `gog ... --help`/`gog schema ... --json` for detail, which is well-signaled, but there are no local reference files in the bundle and the body relies on an external sibling skill rather than clearly split local references, so it does not reach the score-3 ideal. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |