gog-slides

Google Slides operations through gog.

Quality

62%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

Securityby

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./.agents/skills/gog-slides/SKILL.md

Quality

Content

76%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is a tight, well-structured command reference with executable safe-start commands and clear safety guidance, and it correctly delegates shared rules to ../gog/SKILL.md. Its main weakness is the absence of an explicit validation feedback loop for the destructive slide operations it exposes.

Suggestions

Add a short validation checkpoint for destructive commands, e.g. run `--dry-run` then verify the target object ID with `gog slides info` before applying delete/replace operations.

Provide one concrete example invocation for the most common commands (e.g. create, export, insert-image) to lift actionability from 4 to 5.

Consider moving the 25-row command table into a references file (e.g. COMMANDS.md) with a concise overview inline, to tighten progressive disclosure.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	The body is lean with no re-explanation of concepts Claude already knows: a compact safe-start block, a one-line-per-command table, and terse guidance, where every section earns its place; not below 5 because there is no padding to trim.	5 / 5
Actionability	Safe-start gives copy-paste commands (auth list, schema, readonly help) and the body directs to `gog slides <command> --help` and `gog schema slides <command> --json`; it is a 4 rather than 5 because the 25 command rows list purposes but no concrete example invocations for common cases.	4 / 5
Workflow Clarity	A safe-start sequence and safety bullets (--dry-run, --readonly, confirm-before-write) exist, but the skill exposes destructive commands (delete-slide, replace-slide, replace-text) without an explicit validate->fix->retry feedback loop, so the rubric's destructive-operations cap holds it at 3; not a 4 because verification checkpoints are absent.	3 / 5
Progressive Disclosure	Clear sections (Safe start, Commands) and one clearly signaled one-level reference to `../gog/SKILL.md` for shared rules, with no bundle files present; a 4 rather than 5 because the 25-row command table is inline bulk that, while reasonable as an overview, leaves minor organization gaps.	4 / 5
	Total	16 / 20 Passed

Description

48%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is short and correctly scoped to Google Slides via gog, but it states no concrete actions and omits any 'Use when' trigger guidance, capping completeness and specificity. It is distinct enough but would benefit from listing key operations and trigger phrases.

Suggestions

Add 2-3 concrete actions, e.g. 'Create, edit, export, and read Google Slides presentations through gog.'

Append an explicit trigger clause, e.g. 'Use when the user asks to create or modify Google Slides decks or .pptx files.'

Include synonyms users naturally say (presentations, decks, slides, .pptx) to improve trigger-term coverage.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	The phrase "Google Slides operations" names the domain but lists no concrete actions, matching the anchor 'Names the domain but actions are minimal or generic'; it is not a 3 because zero specific verbs (create, export, edit) are stated.	2 / 5
Completeness	A clear 'what' is present ("Google Slides operations through gog") but there is no 'Use when…' trigger clause, and the rubric caps completeness at 3 when explicit trigger guidance is missing; not a 4 because 'when' is entirely absent rather than weakly stated.	3 / 5
Trigger Term Quality	"Google Slides" is a natural term users say, but synonyms and file extensions (presentations, decks, .pptx) are missing, so it sits at 'Some relevant keywords but missing common variations'; not a 4 because coverage is thin.	3 / 5
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	Scoping to "Google Slides through gog" carves a distinct niche with only minor overlap risk against sibling gog skills (gog-docs, gog-sheets); not a 5 because "operations" is generic and the sibling-skill overlap is non-trivial.	4 / 5
	Total	12 / 20 Passed

Validation

93%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

Criteria	Description	Result
referenced_paths_exist	Referenced path issues: 1 missing	Warning

	Total	15 / 16 Passed

Repository: openclaw/gogcli
Path: .agents/skills/gog-slides/SKILL.md
Commit: eb85a99

Reviewed: 3 days ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.