Content
100%Weight 40%Scale 1-3Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a tight, actionable naming-convention reference: concrete Go signatures, a decision tree, explicit forbidden patterns, and verification guidance for renames. It assumes Claude's competence, avoids concept re-explanation, and is well-organized as a self-contained file.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and efficient throughout — tables, decision trees, and code signatures with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every section earns its place. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, executable guidance: a file-naming table, real Go signatures, a forbidden-patterns list, and copy-ready suggestion phrasings rather than abstract direction. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The decision tree is a clearly sequenced 4-step process, and the cleanup guidance includes a verification checkpoint ('Grep for the old name to catch misses') for the destructive rename path. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files are provided and none are needed; the single self-contained body is well-organized into clearly headed sections that read as an overview with easy navigation. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |