Content
65%Weight 40%Scale 1-3Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a dense, actionable reference with concrete paths, code, and test commands, but it is monolithic with no progressive disclosure into bundle files and recapitulates several points in a pitfalls section. Risky sync operations lack explicit inline validation checkpoints.
Suggestions
Move the addon test-rate-card table and detailed test-wiring snippets into a reference file (e.g. references/testing.md) and link to it one level deep to improve progressive disclosure.
Collapse the 'Non-Obvious Pitfalls' section or cross-reference the canonical sections instead of restating phase timing, sync delete+recreate, and EditRunning/addons verbatim to save tokens.
Add an explicit validate-then-proceed checkpoint (e.g. run the relevant go test command and only continue on green) to the sync-algorithm and mutating-operation editing checklists.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is information-dense and assumes Claude's competence (no explanations of basic concepts), but the 'Non-Obvious Pitfalls' section recapitulates points already made earlier (phase timing, sync delete+recreate, EditRunning/addons, item index as version history), adding redundant tokens. Mostly efficient but could be tightened. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides concrete file paths, real Go code snippets (interfaces, SpecPath examples, addon-item identification, test wiring), and copy-paste-ready test commands with exact flags, matching the 'fully executable code/commands' anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The Editing Checklist gives well-sequenced checklists for service/sync/patch/addon changes and the three-pass sync is laid out clearly, but destructive/batch operations (sync delete+recreate of items) lack inline validate-then-proceed checkpoints; per the rubric this caps workflow clarity at 2. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist (references/scripts/assets absent), and the single ~330-line SKILL.md inlines detailed reference tables and test-fixture data that could be split into separate files. Section organization is good, but content that should be separate is inline with no one-level-deep references, fitting the level-2 anchor. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 9 / 12 Passed |