Content
88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A strong, highly actionable debugging workflow: every step is executable with real commands and a genuine validation loop that cross-checks the reproducer's matcher log against the original failure. The only headroom is length — the diagnostic and resolution tables could move to reference files to slim the main skill — and a few redundant asides.
Suggestions
Move the Step 3c log-phrase → root-cause table and/or the Step 6 resolution table into a references/ file (linked like example-diagnosis-report.md) to reduce SKILL.md's inline weight; keep only the most common phrases inline.
Trim redundant asides — e.g., the 'CALLBACK SUCCEDED (spelling matches the literal matcher log output)' parenthetical in Step 0 and the duplicate green-test rationale in Step 5's template section — since the same point is made where it is operationally needed.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The ~350-line body is dense with non-obvious domain knowledge Claude would not know (OV_MATCHER_LOGGING env vars, literal log phrases, TransformationTestsF auto-clone semantics, GraphRewrite wrapper caveat), so nearly every section earns its tokens. Minor over-explanation keeps it below anchor 5 — e.g., the aside that "CALLBACK SUCCEDED" "spelling matches the literal matcher log output" and the green-test rationale being re-explained in both Step 5 and the report template — but it is well above anchor 3 since there is no padding or explanation of known concepts. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully executable throughout: copy-paste bash commands (cmake reconfigure, OV_MATCHER_LOGGING=true ... | tee matcher.log), a runnable Python tally snippet, a complete TEST_F C++ template with build and gtest-filter run commands, and concrete grep recipes for registration and test-target lookup. Placeholders like <build_dir> are explicitly parameterized rather than pseudocode, and the common cases are covered. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear sequence Step 0 → Step 6 with an explicit early-exit condition (all passes fired), prerequisite gating ("Ask the user only if the transformation name or run command is missing"), and strong feedback loops: the per-pass tally before deep analysis, a log-phrase → root-cause mapping table, and the reproducer cross-validation loop ("If the logs diverge... revise the test graph... and repeat"). Validation checkpoints appear at every fragile step (build flag check, log-completion wait, log-vs-log comparison). | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The single bundle file (references/example-diagnosis-report.md) is real, one level deep, and clearly signaled in both the template section and the References section, serving a defined purpose as a quality bar. Below anchor 5 because substantial reference-style material — the 12-row log-phrase/root-cause table (Step 3c) and the resolution table (Step 6) — is fully inlined, making SKILL.md heavier than a lean overview; above anchor 3 because what is split out is well-signaled and the inline content is workflow-critical. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |