Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A compact, well-structured instruction skill that defers detail to one-level-deep docs while keeping the inline workflow concrete and verifiable. Its only weakness is that the deepest executable detail rests in the referenced documents rather than the body itself.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | A lean four-step body with no padding and no re-explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every line carries actionable signal about files, symbols, and checks. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete guidance names exact files (adding_an_architecture.md, supported_models.md), symbols (arch_registry.cpp, RoPE type), and checks (graph-fingerprint check), but the fully executable steps are deferred to the referenced docs. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear numbered sequence with an explicit verification checkpoint ('Verify as that document prescribes, including the graph-fingerprint check') and a re-run feedback loop after shared-logic changes, though detailed recovery steps live in the external doc. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A short single-purpose overview with clearly signaled one-level-deep references to dedicated docs; detail is appropriately split out rather than inlined, and navigation is easy. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |