Content
93%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
An exemplary lean, code-first skill body: executable examples, a concrete API reference, and a sharp rule about dev.write/patch/delete vs node:fs. The only notable gap is that the workflow for writing a new test is implied by structure rather than stated as an ordered sequence, and devAndProductionTest/prodTest are named but never demonstrated.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean: file structure, categories, two complete code examples, and an API list with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows. Every token earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Two copy-paste-ready devTest examples cover the common cases (watch/patch/reload and expected-error flows), and the Key APIs plus "Use dev.write/patch/delete instead of node:fs - they wait for hot-reload" give fully executable guidance. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The sections imply a clear path (file structure → test categories → devTest example → key APIs → error testing), and assertion helpers act as checkpoints, but the sequence is implicit — there are no explicit ordered steps for writing a new test. No destructive or batch operations are involved, so no validation cap applies. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is a self-contained single file with no bundle files; all content is appropriately inline, well-organized into scannable sections, and easy to navigate, which fits the simple-skill exception. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |