Mostly operational and free of concept-padding Claude already knows, but at ~315 lines it repeats some guidance (e.g., 'Do not score design in v1' restates Out Of Scope) and could be tightened to earn a top score.

Provides fully executable, copy-paste-ready guidance: exact rg/grep patterns, a concrete ./gradlew invocation with flags and timeout, a find command with specific globs, and the ceiling-check math example.

A clearly sequenced 9-step process with explicit validation checkpoints — fast-fail scope confirmation, a bounded fallback chain, a verify-findings step, a mandatory ceiling check with shown math, and a report-overwrite guard.

The body is an overview pointing to one-level-deep references that all exist in the bundle (scoring.md, search-playbook.md, report-template.md, canonical-sources.md, diagnostics.md, compose-reports.init.gradle), with heavy rubric content appropriately externalized and clearly signaled.

Lists multiple concrete actions — audit, scan source, score each category 0-10, write a strict markdown report, and summarize fixes — far beyond naming just the domain.

Explicitly answers both what (audit/score/report/summarize) and when via a clear 'Use when...' clause with concrete triggers, satisfying the top anchor.

The 'Use when' clause covers natural phrasings a user would actually say: reviewing a Compose codebase, rating repository quality, inspecting recomposition/state issues, or running a Compose audit.

The Android Jetpack Compose audit niche across four specific categories is well-scoped and unlikely to fire for unrelated skills like a generic code review or material-3 audit.