Content
0%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body consists entirely of placeholder filler ("Line N does a thing.") with no structure, guidance, code, or references — it is untriggerable as a set of instructions. It scores at the floor on every dimension because it contains no instruction content whatsoever.
Suggestions
Replace the filler lines with concise, actionable instructions or executable code covering the skill's actual task.
Add section headers (e.g., a quick-start section) to give the body navigable structure, and move bulk detail to one-level-deep reference files if needed.
If any multi-step or batch operation is involved, sequence the steps explicitly and include validation checkpoints.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is 500 repetitions of "Line N does a thing." — pure padding with zero information value, the most severely verbose case the anchor describes ('heavily padded', nothing Claude doesn't already know or nothing at all). | 1 / 5 |
Actionability | "Line 0 does a thing." through "Line 499 does a thing." are entirely abstract placeholders; there is no concrete code, command, or specific instruction anywhere, matching the lowest anchor ('only describes rather than instructs' — and here it barely even describes). | 1 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | There is no sequence, no steps, and no validation of any kind; the numbered lines are filler indices, not a workflow, matching the 'steps missing or incoherent' anchor. | 1 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A 500-line monolithic block with no section headers, no navigation, and no references (no bundle files exist to link to) matches the 'monolithic wall of text with no structure; impossible to navigate' anchor; it is far beyond the 300-line no-headers case at anchor 2. | 1 / 5 |
Total | 4 / 20 Passed |