CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo
SkillPublic

fluentbit-validator

Validates syntax, checks pipeline tag connections, detects security misconfigurations, audits best practices, and performs dry-run testing for Fluent Bit configurations. Use this skill when working with Fluent Bit config files, validating syntax, checking for best practices, identifying security issues, performing dry-run testing, or troubleshooting configuration-related errors.

Quality

85%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide
SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

81%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A highly actionable, well-sequenced validation workflow with excellent feedback loops and correct externalization of detail to real bundle files. The main cost is token weight: substantial duplication between the workflow stages, the anti-patterns section, and repeated report-format examples.

Suggestions

Consolidate the Anti-Patterns section: keep only entries that add new failure modes (storage.path overlap, tls.verify, 0.0.0.0 listeners) and drop the ones that restate workflow-stage checks verbatim, or move the full list to a reference file.

Replace step 8's second full report example with a one-line pointer to the format defined in step 1.

Reconcile the check-type lists: the stage summary table omits `syntax` while the validate_config.py reference lists it among available checks.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is mostly tight and operational with no filler explaining concepts Claude already knows, but the ten-entry Anti-Patterns section (~90 lines) restates several checks already covered in the workflow stages (hardcoded credentials, TLS, Mem_Buf_Limit, unmatched tags, approval-before-fix, dry-run disclosure), and step 8's report-only example duplicates step 1's report format.

3 / 5

Actionability

Fully executable throughout: copy-paste commands ("python3 scripts/validate_config.py --file <config-file> --check all", "fluent-bit -c <config-file> --dry-run"), concrete MCP invocations with parameters, a fallback search-query template, and specific before/after ini fixes with real values (Mem_Buf_Limit 50MB, tls.verify On with a CA path).

5 / 5

Workflow Clarity

The seven validation stages are sequenced in a summary table with a recommended single-command path, and the fix loop (summarize → categorize by severity → propose fixes → user approval → apply → re-run validation → completion summary) provides explicit checkpoints, feedback loops, and handling for the unavailable-dry-run case.

5 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

Field-level detail is well externalized one level deep to references/SECTION-RULES.md (292 lines) and test fixtures, and every referenced path (scripts/validate_config.py, scripts/validate.sh, references/SECTION-RULES.md, references/test-fixtures.md) exists; however, the large inlined anti-patterns section and two full report-format examples could live in reference files, and the stage table omits the `syntax` check type that the script reference lists.

4 / 5

Total

17

/

20

Passed

Description

83%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong description with explicit what/when structure, third-person voice, and concrete domain-specific actions. Its only weaknesses are minor: the performance-analysis capability is unmentioned and a few natural trigger synonyms (.conf, fluent-bit.conf) are missing.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists five concrete third-person actions ("Validates syntax, checks pipeline tag connections, detects security misconfigurations, audits best practices, and performs dry-run testing") anchored to the Fluent Bit domain, but omits the performance/memory-tuning stage the skill actually covers, matching the 'several specific actions with minor gaps' anchor rather than comprehensive coverage.

4 / 5

Completeness

Explicitly answers both what (five concrete validation capabilities) and when ("Use this skill when working with Fluent Bit config files, validating syntax, checking for best practices, identifying security issues, performing dry-run testing, or troubleshooting configuration-related errors"), mirroring the anchor-5 example structure with concrete trigger phrases.

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Natural trigger phrases like "working with Fluent Bit config files", "validating syntax", "performing dry-run testing", and "troubleshooting configuration-related errors" are present, but common variations such as the .conf file extension, "fluent-bit.conf", or "reviewing a config" are missing.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The Fluent Bit pin gives it a clear niche distinct from generic config/linting skills, but the shared "working with Fluent Bit config files" trigger overlaps with the sibling fluentbit-generator skill and generic config-validation phrasing, matching the 'minor overlap risk with closely related skills' anchor.

4 / 5

Total

17

/

20

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository

pantheon-org/tekhne

Path

skills/ci-cd/fluentbit/validator/SKILL.md

Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.