Content
93%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-built hub skill: lean and executable with copy-paste commands, complete config examples, and a clean one-level-deep reference structure. The only gap is the absence of an explicit error-recovery feedback loop in the workflow beyond the single embedded lint verification step.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is a lean navigation hub that assumes Claude's competence — it never explains what Nx or a monorepo is, keeps anti-pattern rationales to single WHY lines, and every section (commands, configs, constraints) earns its tokens. Matches the 'lean and efficient' anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully executable guidance: copy-paste commands like 'nx affected -t lint,test,build --base=origin/main --parallel=3' and 'rg -n "@nx/enforce-module-boundaries|depConstraints" .', plus two complete JSON configuration examples (targetDefaults and ESLint depConstraints) covering the common cases. Matches the fully-executable anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear five-step sequence is present with an explicit validation checkpoint embedded in step 4 ('verify violations fail with nx lint --skip-nx-cache'), but there is no error-recovery feedback loop describing what to do when boundary lint or affected runs fail. Fits anchor 4 (most checkpoints present, minor validation gaps), not anchor 5 which requires feedback loops for error recovery. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Clear overview structure with a well-signaled references table; all four referenced files (project-graph-configuration.md, caching-strategies.md, project-boundaries.md, affected-commands.md) exist in the bundle and are one level deep with no nested references, and inline config examples are sized appropriately for a hub. Matches the clear-overview anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |