CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo
SkillPublic

pryor-esque-confessional-standup

Generate an original, autobiographical confessional stand-up bit/story/monologue built from a genuinely painful personal anecdote, using techniques like multi-voice character embodiment (switching voice mid-story to become a parent/cop/friend/animal/younger-self), rhythmic escalating repetition, self-implicating honesty, vivid sensory specificity, plus a blunt closing truth in place of a tidy moral. Use it when a user wants to write, punch up, workshop, critique such a piece before it gets tested at an open mic. Do not use it for observational one-liners with no personal narrator, absurdist/surreal sketches, character-only sketch writing, requests to reproduce, quote, transcribe, imitate a real performer's actual routine.

77

Quality

97%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide
SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A well-structured instruction-only skill: concrete examples for every mechanic and anti-pattern, a sequenced workflow with an explicit checklist and troubleshooting feedback loops, and clean offloading of advanced craft to two well-signaled reference files. The only cost is token weight from restating the moral-ending and voice-switch rules across four and three sections respectively.

Suggestions

Consolidate the no-tidy-moral rule: state it once authoritatively (Anti-Pattern 4 or Mechanic 6) and have Workflow step 7 and Troubleshooting reference that section instead of restating it.

Merge the voice-switch guidance in Workflow step 4, Mechanic 2, and Anti-Pattern 3 into the mechanic section, keeping the workflow step to a one-line pointer.

Trim or drop the italic 'Demonstrates:' notes that merely restate what the example already shows (e.g., mechanics 1 and 4), keeping only those that add a non-obvious principle.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Sections are tight and the Mindset framing earns its place, but there is systematic restatement: the no-tidy-moral rule appears in Workflow step 7 ('Keep the ending to one blunt, unresolved truth'), Mechanic 6, Troubleshooting ('If the ending still resolves into a moral, treat it as unfinished'), and Anti-Pattern 4; voice-switch guidance likewise appears in Workflow step 4, Mechanic 2, and Anti-Pattern 3. This is more than the 'minor instances' of the anchor-5 case but falls short of anchor 3's unnecessary explanation, since each restatement (do / how / fix / never-do) carries distinct pedagogical function.

4 / 5

Actionability

Every technique is executable: each of the six Core Mechanics ships a concrete, freshly invented example plus a 'Demonstrates:' note, every Anti-Pattern gives BAD/GOOD contrast examples ('And then, doing my dad's voice...' vs "And then: 'boy. You better run.'"), and workflow steps are specific ('Add a repeating phrase or reaction, two or three times, each pass louder or sharper than the last'). For an instruction-only skill this is copy-paste-ready guidance covering the common cases.

5 / 5

Workflow Clarity

The 8-step Workflow is clearly sequenced and closes with an explicit validation step ('Check the draft against the anti-patterns below: is the narrator only a victim anywhere?') plus a read-aloud check; Troubleshooting supplies feedback loops for error recovery ('If a draft still fails to implicate the narrator, revisit step 2... Remove the last line and replace it with a plainer restatement... Run the anti-pattern checklist again').

5 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

The body is the core working knowledge with headers and examples; deeper craft is split into two real one-level-deep reference files (references/voice-embodiment-techniques.md, references/structuring-the-turn.md — both verified to exist with no nested references), signaled by a Topic/Reference/When-to-Use table that states exactly when to consult each. Easy navigation, appropriate split.

5 / 5

Total

19

/

20

Passed

Description

100%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A dense, precise description that names the deliverable, enumerates the specific techniques, gives explicit positive triggers and explicit exclusions, all in third person. Slight length is offset by full information density with no padding.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

The description lists multiple concrete, named capabilities — 'multi-voice character embodiment (switching voice mid-story to become a parent/cop/friend/animal/younger-self), rhythmic escalating repetition, self-implicating honesty, vivid sensory specificity, plus a blunt closing truth' — alongside a specific deliverable ('autobiographical confessional stand-up bit/story/monologue'). It is written in third person and every clause carries capability information, matching the comprehensive-coverage anchor rather than the 'minor gaps' anchor at 4.

5 / 5

Completeness

It explicitly answers both questions: what ('Generate an original, autobiographical confessional stand-up bit... using techniques like...') and when ('Use it when a user wants to write, punch up, workshop, critique such a piece before it gets tested at an open mic'), with concrete trigger phrases plus an explicit exclusion clause ('Do not use it for observational one-liners...').

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Natural user phrasing is comprehensively covered with synonyms: 'stand-up', 'bit/story/monologue', 'write, punch up, workshop, critique', 'open mic', 'personal anecdote'. A user would genuinely say these when needing this skill ('punch up my set before my open mic'), and coverage exceeds the anchor-4 example's term count; no natural synonym is conspicuously missing.

5 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

A clear niche (confessional autobiographical stand-up storytelling) is reinforced by explicit boundaries against adjacent skills: 'observational one-liners with no personal narrator, absurdist/surreal sketches, character-only sketch writing, requests to reproduce, quote, transcribe, imitate a real performer's actual routine'. Minimal conflict risk.

5 / 5

Total

20

/

20

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository

pantheon-org/tekhne

Path

skills/comedy/pryor-esque-confessional-standup/SKILL.md

Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.