Content
65%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured overview skill with executable commands, concrete GOOD/BAD configs, and exemplary reference-file organization. Its weaknesses are duplicated trigger/scope sections that could be merged, implicit rather than sequenced workflows (the enable-flags-then-verify loop is never spelled out), and missing inline guidance for the module-resolution use case.
Suggestions
Collapse the redundant trigger/scope sections — merge "When to Apply" and "Use When" into one section, and fold "When NOT to Use" into "Out of Scope" — since both currently restate the same four scenarios in slightly different forms.
Add an explicit step sequence for the main flows with a validation checkpoint, e.g., bootstrap: `tsc --init` → enable strict flags → add extras (noUncheckedIndexedAccess, exactOptionalPropertyTypes) → **verify**: `npx tsc --noEmit` → fix surfaced errors before proceeding.
Add a short inline decision snippet for the module-resolution use case (e.g., when to pick `node` vs `bundler` vs `nodenext` based on module type and bundler presence), keeping the deep detail in `references/module-resolution.md`.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is predominantly lean — commands are one-liners and anti-patterns earn their tokens with concrete configs — but the same trigger/scope information is restated four times across "When to Apply", "Use When", "Scope → In Scope", and "When NOT to Use" (overlapping "Out of Scope"). Anchors above (efficient, minor trims) and below (several padded sections) bracket this; the redundancy is real but each section is short, so it sits at "could be tightened" rather than "noticeably verbose". | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Quick Commands are fully executable ("npx tsc --noEmit --extendedDiagnostics") and the anti-patterns give copy-paste-ready jsonc configs with real flag names, covering the bootstrap and strictness cases well. The gap: module-resolution debugging — one of the four declared use cases — gets no inline actionable guidance (e.g., a strategy-selection snippet), only a reference pointer, so coverage of common cases is incomplete. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | No explicit step sequences with checkpoints exist. The slow-tsc flow is implied ("profile before guessing — tsc --extendedDiagnostics... then act on what it reports") and the natural bootstrap flow (init → add flags → verify) is never stated as a sequence — especially the "re-run tsc --noEmit to confirm the project still type-checks after enabling new flags" validation step. Anchor 3 (sequence present but implicit, checkpoints missing) is the best fit; operations here are consultative rather than destructive, so no lower cap applies. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The SKILL.md body is a genuine overview (~130 lines) with all four declared references verified to exist, one level deep, and clearly signaled via a two-column "File | Covers" table mapping each file to its topic. Content is appropriately split — option details, flag semantics, resolution strategies, and performance work all live in the reference files — matching the top anchor for structure and navigation. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |