Content
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-organized, lean instruction skill with a clear sequenced workflow and recovery guidance. The one weakness is actionability: the body never names or shows how to invoke a concrete browser-automation tool, so a reader lacks a copy-paste entry point.
Suggestions
Add a short 'Launch' snippet naming the concrete tool (e.g., Playwright/Puppeteer) with an executable launch + navigate + screenshot call so the skill has a copy-paste entry point.
Include one minimal end-to-end example script covering launch, navigate, wait-for-selector, screenshot, and console capture to lift actionability from guidance to executable.
In 'Driving the browser,' pair the abstract steps with the specific API calls or CLI commands they map to (e.g., page.waitForSelector, page.screenshot) so each step is directly actionable.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean decision/guidance prose that assumes competence ('Prefer waiting for a specific selector or network-idle over arbitrary sleeps') without explaining what browsers, SPAs, or libraries are, matching the level-3 anchor; not level 2 because there is little unnecessary explanation to tighten away. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Concrete specifics exist (viewport sizes '1366×768'/'390×844', '30s' timeout, 'retry once'), but there is no executable code or named tool invocation in the body — Puppeteer/Playwright appear only in tags, never telling the reader how to launch — matching the level-2 anchor of incomplete guidance; not level 3 because nothing is copy-paste ready, and not level 1 because the guidance is specific rather than vague. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | 'Driving the browser' is a clear 7-step sequence with explicit checkpoints (wait for a selector, capture evidence before perturbing state, close cleanly) and recovery cues ('retry once with a longer timeout, then escalate'), matching the level-3 anchor; not level 2 because checkpoints and feedback loops are explicit, and the destructive/batch cap does not apply to this inspection task. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | A single self-contained file (~80 lines) with well-organized sections and no inlined reference material that belongs elsewhere; the rubric notes that skills needing no external references can score 3 on well-organized sections alone, so this matches level 3 rather than level 2's 'content that should be separate is inline.' | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |