Content
93%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
An exemplary instruction-only skill body: lean, directive, and free of padding, with a concrete ordered pass, measurable thresholds, and a copy-paste output template. The only meaningful improvement would be a lightweight self-check on the generated output before presenting it.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Every line is a directive or a template; the body never explains concepts Claude already knows (it cites 'WCAG AA at minimum' without defining it, and 'Save changes beats Submit' teaches the rule in six tokens). There is no padded section to trim — anchor 5. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | For an instruction-only skill the guidance is fully actionable: an ordered 9-step pass with concrete, checkable criteria ('within 3 seconds', 'on blur, not on every keystroke', '44x44 px'), plus a copy-paste output template with severity groups and a mandatory 'strengths to keep' section. Per the rubric's scoring notes, absence of code is not penalized when guidance is this actionable. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The sequence is explicit (pre-critique context -> ordered pass -> formatted output) with a real validation gate ('If any of these is missing, ask. Critique without these is opinion'). It falls short of anchor 5 only because there is no post-output verification step (e.g., confirming each finding pairs exactly one issue with one fix) — a minor validation gap, matching anchor 4. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist and none are needed: the entire body is core operating procedure that must be held in context during a live critique pass. Sections are cleanly labeled and easy to navigate, and nothing that belongs in a separate reference file is inlined — anchor 5 for a self-contained, well-sectioned skill. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |