Compatibility entry point for failed, stalled, looping, or over-recovered Paperclip work. Use fix-failed-paperclip-run for the full diagnosis, regression, repair, real verification, and green-PR workflow; honor an explicitly requested diagnosis-only scope.
61
77%
Does it follow best practices?
Run evals on this skill
Adds up to 20 points to the overall score
Passed
No findings from the security scan
Fix and improve this skill with Tessl
tessl review fix ./.agents/skills/diagnose-why-work-stopped/SKILL.mdUse Fix Failed Paperclip Run. It owns the current workflow: find the first causal failure, reproduce it red, repair the shared contract, test second-order effects, verify the real workflow, and deliver a PR with passing checks. A normal request to fix stopped work continues through that workflow without a separate plan-approval gate.
If the user or calling workflow explicitly asks for diagnosis only or requires approval before implementation, perform the investigation and safety analysis within that scope. For example, a Terminal-Bench diagnosis child does not override the loop's board approval boundary. Keep the next action and its owner explicit.
For issue-tree diagnosis, read the current doc/execution-semantics.md, inspect the
relevant subtree and recent repairs, and classify non-progressing nodes:
Preserve these three invariants together:
Frame any repair as a general behavioral contract, check it against a productive counterexample, and follow the new skill through the authorized finish line. Historical task links and private incident access are not required.
paperclipai/paperclip
412914c
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.