Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-engineered skill body: tight rule-based writing, concrete file paths and output contracts, a sequenced workflow with verification, and exemplary progressive disclosure into four real, well-scoped reference files. The remaining headroom is minor — some redundant restatement of the hero-bank exception and no explicit failure-recovery loop.
Suggestions
Consolidate the hero-bank exception, which is stated in the intro, Non-Negotiable Rules, the surface-selection section, and the Validation Checklist — one canonical statement plus one checklist line would reclaim tokens.
Add a brief failure-recovery note to the workflow (e.g., what to do when the Validation Checklist fails or canonical source paths are missing) to close the feedback-loop gap in workflow clarity.
hero-capsule-bank.md's Source Precedence cites sibling-skill paths (references/capsule-bank-spec.md, references/brand-tokens.md, references/composition-recipes.md) that are not in this bundle; qualify them as external/optional so the workflow does not stall when they are absent.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes competence: no space is spent explaining what capsules or design systems are, and every section carries rules rather than filler (e.g., "Use heartbeat status capsules for small solid status markers: idle/active gray, running blue pulse, paused amber, error red blink"). It is a 4 rather than 5 because the hero-bank exception is stated four times (intro, Non-Negotiable Rules, capsule-surface section, Validation Checklist) and the agent-representation rule is likewise repeated across three sections — small trims are available without losing clarity; it is well above the 3 anchor where unnecessary explanation appears. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance is concrete and executable for an orchestration skill: exact source paths ("ui/src/components/AgentCapsule.tsx", "ui/src/lib/status-colors.ts"), specific reference files to read per family, concrete status color semantics, and a defined output contract (family, workflow, seed/config, dimensions, divergences). Per the rubric's instruction-skill note, absence of code is not penalized, but it stops short of the 5 anchor because the actual rendering specs are entirely deferred to reference files and some steps (e.g., how to record reproducibility data) rely on the references; it is clearly above 3, which requires pseudocode or missing key details. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The 6-step Implementation Workflow is clearly sequenced with a verification checkpoint ("Verify that the result still reads as agent-related. Remove capsules if they became decoration.") and is reinforced by a Validation Checklist section. It misses 5 because there is no feedback-loop handling (no 'if the check fails, do X' recovery guidance), and comfortably exceeds 3, where checkpoints would be absent or implicit — here the verify step and checklist are explicit. No destructive/batch cap applies. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a genuine overview that splits detail into four one-level-deep reference files, all of which exist in the bundle and are well signaled both inline ("Read references/hero-capsule-bank.md before drawing it") and in a final References section with one-line descriptions. Reference files contain the deep specs (palettes, geometry, workflows, export controls) and do not chain into further skill-internal references, matching the 5 anchor's clean overview-plus-navigable-references structure. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |