Content
81%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tightly written instruction-only skill with an explicit, well-validated workflow and clear pointers to its companion skill. The only mild weakness is restated principles between the prose sections and the closing checklist.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and assumes Claude's competence without explaining planning basics, but a few principles are restated across the prose body and the checklist repeats the same rules, adding modest redundancy. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Gives concrete, executable guidance (specific qualifying-boundary criteria, 'blockedByIssueIds' on the dependent issue, reviewer writes on their own issue, task matrix fields), with only minor reliance on abstract directives like 'plan deeply'. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear multi-step sequence (build one end-to-end task, add issues only for qualifying boundaries, write a task matrix, run a merge-back pass, create, then re-fetch and verify the graph) with an explicit validation/feedback checkpoint that leaves the planning issue blocked until the verified graph is correct. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized with clear section headers and a self-contained body that appropriately points to the companion paperclip skill for mechanics rather than duplicating it; no bundle files exist to evaluate, and content is correctly kept inline rather than split. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |