Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A lean, well-structured skill body with a clearly sequenced workflow, an explicit verification step, and exemplary progressive disclosure — both bundle files are real, purposefully described, and referenced at the right moment. The remaining headroom is small: a feedback loop for failed verification, concrete acquisition commands in step 1, and trimming mild redundancy between the posture and workflow sections.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Efficient bullet-style body that assumes Claude's competence and explains nothing the model already knows; every section carries task-specific guidance. Not 5 because there is minor trimmable redundancy (the "Default posture" bullets reappear nearly verbatim as workflow steps, and the "Useful recommendation buckets" overlap the recommendation options); not 3 because there is no real over-explanation or padding. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, executable guidance throughout — an 8-step workflow, a numbered report structure, explicit recommendation buckets ("merge as-is / merge after specific redesign / salvage specific pieces"), and a verification checklist; absence of code is acceptable for this instruction-only skill. Not 5 because step 1 ("acquire and frame the target") gives no concrete commands for obtaining a diff or branch, and no example finding format is shown; not 3 because the guidance is specific and directly executable rather than high-level hints. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clearly sequenced 8-step workflow with explicit numbered order and a terminal "Verify before handoff" checklist (artifact path exists, findings match code, forbidden strings absent, tests skipped declared). Not 5 because there is no feedback loop stating what to do when verification fails (fix and re-verify); not 3 because an explicit validation checkpoint is present, not missing or implicit. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Verified against the actual bundle: both referenced files (references/style-guide.md, assets/html-report-starter.html) exist, are described with purpose ("for visual direction and report presentation rules", "for a reusable standalone HTML/CSS starter"), and are pointed to at exactly the right point in the workflow ("Before building from scratch, read references/style-guide.md"). References are one level deep — the style guide references only the starter asset, not further nested files — and the body stays a proper overview. Matches the 5 anchor; no organization gaps to justify 4. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |