Content
100%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tight, highly actionable instruction-only skill with a clear QA validation workflow, explicit evidence and waiver checkpoints, and clean self-contained organization.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and directive with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows (e.g. it never explains what QA is), so every token earns its place per the level-3 anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | It provides a concrete Given/when/then template with a worked example, eight specific coverage areas with concrete cases (0-row CSV export, 409 conflict, 404), and a named three-section handoff format — fully actionable guidance, not the vague level-1 or pseudocode level-2 anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The process is clearly sequenced with explicit validation checkpoints and feedback loops ('Looks good to me' without evidence is not a pass; a failing criterion blocks unless waived with a tracked follow-up; adding a criterion mid-pass restarts the pass), matching the level-3 anchor with explicit checkpoints and error-recovery loops. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | It is a self-contained, well-sectioned instruction skill with no external references and no nested/deep references, so per the guideline for skills with no need for external references it earns 3 on well-organized sections alone. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |