CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

release

Coordinate a full Paperclip release across engineering verification, npm, GitHub, smoke testing, and announcement follow-up. Use when leadership asks to ship a release, not merely to discuss versioning.

72

Quality

88%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

High

Do not use without reviewing

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

92%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

An highly actionable, clearly sequenced release runbook with strong validation checkpoints; its main gap is the absence of progressive disclosure, keeping a large amount of detail inline in a single file.

Suggestions

Move the verbose Step 8 Cases API request/response schemas and the command catalogs into a references/ file (e.g. CASES.md) and link to it from SKILL.md, keeping the overview lean.

De-duplicate the Trigger section in the body against the frontmatter description to avoid restating the same release phrasings twice.

Trim meta-explanatory sentences like "The fields schema intentionally uses all generic JSON value types..." unless they change what Claude should emit.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is dense procedural runbook content with almost no conceptual padding Claude would already know; domain specifics (the YYYY.MDD.P version model, the Cases schema) earn their tokens.

3 / 3

Actionability

It provides copy-paste-ready commands (pnpm gate, npm view, release.sh, docker smoke test) and complete HTTP/JSON examples for the Cases tree, with explicit env vars and arguments.

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

Steps 0–8 are explicitly sequenced with preconditions, a verification gate, canary/smoke checkpoints, dry-run-before-live ordering, and a Failure Handling section with feedback loops.

3 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

It is a well-sectioned but monolithic ~315-line SKILL.md with no bundle/reference files; large blocks like the full Cases API schema and command catalogs are inline rather than split into one-level-deep references.

2 / 3

Total

11

/

12

Passed

Description

85%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong, third-person description with an explicit Use-when clause and a clear niche; its only weakness is limited trigger-term variety in the description itself.

Suggestions

Expand the description's trigger terms to include natural phrasings like "do a release", "cut the stable release", or "promote a canary to stable" rather than relying on the body for those variations.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

"Coordinate a full Paperclip release across engineering verification, npm, GitHub, smoke testing, and announcement follow-up" names multiple concrete release surfaces rather than vague abstractions.

3 / 3

Completeness

It states both what (coordinate a full release across named surfaces) and when (explicit "Use when leadership asks to ship a release, not merely to discuss versioning").

3 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

"Use when leadership asks to ship a release" provides a natural trigger, but common variations like "do a release", "cut a release", "promote to stable" appear only in the body, not the description.

2 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The Paperclip-specific release niche and the "not merely to discuss versioning" qualifier give it distinct triggers unlikely to fire for unrelated skills.

3 / 3

Total

11

/

12

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

referenced_paths_exist

Referenced path issues: 1 missing

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
paperclipai/paperclip
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.