Content
82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A highly actionable, well-structured skill body: concrete tokens, a copy-paste SVG starter, a sequenced workflow with viewer verification, and clean one-level references. The main improvement opportunities are moving the inline viewer-page spec into a reference or the existing site template, and adding a quick render check for the wireframe SVGs themselves.
Suggestions
Move the viewer-page anatomy, viewer house style, and responsive breakpoint behavior into a reference file (or fold the essential invariants into assets/site-template.html) and keep only the file layout and trigger phrases inline, tightening both conciseness and progressive disclosure.
Add a lightweight verification step to the core workflow (e.g., open the written SVG in a browser or re-read it to confirm coordinates snap to 8px and text has stroke="none") to give the SVG path the same checkpoint the viewer path already has.
Trim the here-now publishing section to the invocation shape and the two or three non-obvious gotchas, deferring credential and claim-token details to that skill.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense and operational — token table, exact breakpoints, gotchas like 'set stroke="none" on <text>' — with almost no explanation of concepts Claude already knows. It falls short of level 5 because the ~60-line inline viewer-page spec (CSS custom properties, responsive behavior per breakpoint) and the detailed here-now publishing steps duplicate material that the site template and the here-now skill already carry. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Copy-paste-ready minimal SVG, exact file paths (wireframes/<slug>.svg, design/<task-slug>/index.html), exact stroke/fill/type tokens on an 8px grid, and a concrete publish command with --slug and install fallback — specific examples cover the common cases fully. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The six-step workflow is clearly sequenced with a scope-confirmation step and an explicit verification pass for viewer pages ('walk it at 1440×900, 768×1024, and 390×844'), but plain SVG wireframe production has no render/validity checkpoint, so it stops short of the feedback-loop completeness of level 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Three real, one-level-deep references (references/components.md, references/grid-system.md, references/examples.md) are clearly signaled with explicit load-when instructions, plus three template assets. It misses level 5 because the full viewer-page anatomy, viewer house style, and responsive spec are inlined in SKILL.md rather than split out, partially duplicating assets/site-template.html. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |