resume-bullet-writer

Transform weak resume bullets into achievement-focused statements with metrics and impact

Quality

37%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

Securityby

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/resume-bullet-writer/SKILL.md

Quality

Content

42%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The skill is highly actionable with excellent concrete examples and clear frameworks, but is severely bloated. It explains concepts Claude already knows extensively (action verbs, STAR method, basic resume advice), includes exhaustive industry-specific examples that could be generated on-the-fly, and dumps everything into a single monolithic file. The content would benefit enormously from aggressive trimming and splitting into reference files.

Suggestions

Cut the power verbs section entirely — Claude already knows strong action verbs. At most, include 2-3 examples inline.

Reduce industry-specific examples from 7 industries to 1-2 inline, or move them to a separate EXAMPLES.md reference file.

Remove the 'Common Bullet Writing Mistakes' section — the before/after examples in the frameworks already demonstrate these principles without redundant explanation.

Add a validation step in the workflow: after rewriting bullets, verify metrics with the user and confirm the improved bullet accurately represents their experience before finalizing.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	Extremely verbose at 400+ lines. Extensively explains concepts Claude already knows (what STAR method is, what action verbs are, basic resume writing principles). Lists of power verbs, industry examples across 7 domains, and common mistakes are all knowledge Claude possesses. The content could be reduced by 70%+ while retaining all novel guidance.	1 / 3
Actionability	Provides highly concrete, specific examples with before/after transformations, exact formulas (X-Y-Z, STAR, CAR), a clear step-by-step process, and a detailed output format template. Every framework includes executable examples that Claude can directly apply.	3 / 3
Workflow Clarity	The 5-step bullet writing process is clearly sequenced and the implementation checklist provides good structure. However, there are no validation checkpoints or feedback loops — no guidance on verifying the rewritten bullet with the user, confirming metric accuracy, or iterating based on feedback. For a task involving user-provided information, this is a gap.	2 / 3
Progressive Disclosure	Monolithic wall of text with no references to external files. All content — power verbs, 7 industry examples, quantification strategies, special situations — is inlined when much of it could be split into reference files. No bundle files exist to support this, and the skill makes no attempt at organizing content across files.	1 / 3
	Total	7 / 12 Passed

Description

32%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description communicates a clear core action—transforming resume bullets into achievement-focused statements—but lacks an explicit 'Use when' clause, which significantly hurts completeness. It would benefit from broader trigger terms (CV, bullet points, work experience) and a more comprehensive list of specific capabilities beyond the single transformation action.

Suggestions

Add an explicit 'Use when...' clause, e.g., 'Use when the user asks to improve, rewrite, or strengthen resume bullets, CV entries, or work experience descriptions.'

Include common keyword variations users might say: 'CV', 'bullet points', 'work experience', 'job application', 'quantify accomplishments'.

List additional specific actions beyond transforming bullets, such as 'adds quantifiable metrics, reframes duties as accomplishments, suggests stronger action verbs'.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	Names the domain (resume bullets) and a core action (transform into achievement-focused statements), and mentions metrics and impact, but doesn't list multiple distinct concrete actions beyond the single transformation task.	2 / 3
Completeness	Describes what the skill does but has no explicit 'Use when...' clause or equivalent trigger guidance, and per the rubric a missing 'Use when' clause caps completeness at 2—but since the 'when' is entirely absent (not even implied beyond the what), this scores at 1.	1 / 3
Trigger Term Quality	Includes natural terms like 'resume bullets', 'achievement', and 'metrics', but misses common variations users might say such as 'CV', 'bullet points', 'work experience', 'job application', or 'quantify accomplishments'.	2 / 3
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	Fairly specific to resume bullet improvement, which is a recognizable niche, but could overlap with general resume writing, career coaching, or professional writing skills without clearer trigger boundaries.	2 / 3
	Total	7 / 12 Passed

Validation

100%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 11 / 11 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository: paramchoudhary/resumeskills
Path: skills/resume-bullet-writer/SKILL.md
Commit: 74ae19e

Reviewed: about 14 hours ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.