Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tight, actionable instruction body: it specifies exactly where to record a pattern, what the entry must contain, and the template for the companion document, with an appropriately minimal one-level-deep reference structure. The only meaningful gap is the absence of a worked example entry, and slight wordiness in the emphasis sentence.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean (~140 words) with no explanations of concepts Claude already knows; only minor wordiness (the 'IMPORTANT - ... future YOU ... MATCH' emphasis and the '(i.e. what it enables you to implement)' parenthetical) could be trimmed. It is not 5 because a few tokens restate points rather than earning their place. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | For an instruction-only skill the guidance is concrete: exact target file ('sibling `patterns/SKILL.md`'), required entry contents (DESCRIPTION plus a '- Reference:' pointer), and an explicit document template (Problem, Solution, Complete Code Example, Key Points, When to Use). It misses 5 because no example entry or document is shown to copy. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Two clearly sequenced, unambiguous steps for a simple non-destructive skill, so no validation checkpoints are required. It falls short of 5 only because 'the appropriate category section' offers no fallback if no existing category fits. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is under 50 lines, well-organized, and references the patterns/SKILL.md index and patterns/ documents exactly one level deep with clear signaling; no bundle files exist that need reorganizing. This matches the clear-overview, well-signaled-references anchor, including the simple-skill exception. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |