CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

pedagogy-review

Holistic pedagogical review of a lecture deck (`.qmd` or `.tex`). Checks narrative arc, prerequisite assumptions, worked examples, notation clarity, and deck-level pacing. Use when user says "pedagogy review", "does this teach well?", "is the flow right?", "will students follow?", "review the narrative", or before teaching a deck for the first time. Read-only; produces a report.

Invalid
This skill can't be scored yet
Validation errors are blocking scoring. Review and fix them to unlock Quality, Impact and Security scores. See what needs fixing →
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Pedagogical Review of Lecture Slides

Perform a comprehensive pedagogical review.

Steps

  1. Identify the file specified in $ARGUMENTS

    • If no argument, ask user which lecture to review
    • If just a name, look in Quarto/ or Slides/
  2. Launch the pedagogy-reviewer agent with the full file path

    • The agent checks 13 pedagogical patterns
    • Performs deck-level analysis (narrative arc, pacing, visual rhythm, notation)
    • Considers student perspective (prerequisites, objections)
  3. The agent produces a report saved to: quality_reports/[FILENAME_WITHOUT_EXT]_pedagogy_report.md

  4. Present summary to user:

    • Patterns followed vs violated (out of 13)
    • Deck-level assessments
    • Critical recommendations (top 3-5)

Important Notes

  • This is a read-only review — no files are edited
  • Focuses on pedagogy not visual layout (use /visual-audit for that)
  • For a combined review, use /slide-excellence instead
Repository
pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow
Last updated
First committed

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.