CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

pr-bot-reviews

Triage, verdict, and reply to automated PR review comments from GitHub Copilot and Greptile, then iterate until the bots have nothing left to say. Use this whenever a pull request has feedback from Copilot or Greptile and the user wants those comments handled — e.g. "deal with the bot review comments", "address the Copilot/Greptile feedback on my PR", "go through the review bots", "resolve the automated review", or after pushing a branch and asking to "clear the AI reviewers". It judges each comment on its merits (fixing real issues, pushing back on nitpicks), replies inline on each thread, commits and pushes fixes, re-requests review from both bots, waits for the fresh round, and repeats until clean.

77

Quality

96%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A well-engineered loop skill: executable commands, an explicit sequenced workflow with validation and feedback loops, and clean one-level-deep progressive disclosure via real bundle files. The only slack is minor philosophical prose in the principle section.

Suggestions

Tighten the 'Principle: you are pragmatic, not obedient' section — drop rhetorical lines like 'You are having a technical conversation, not winning an argument' that restate the already-clear bar.

The Fix/Push back/Verify bullets are useful but could be compressed into a tighter decision table to reduce token weight in the hot path of the loop.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Largely lean and assumes Claude's competence (no preamble explaining gh, PRs, or bots), but the 'pragmatic, not obedient' principle section carries some philosophical prose ('You are having a technical conversation, not winning an argument') that could be trimmed without losing guidance.

4 / 5

Actionability

Fully executable: exact gh REST endpoints, copy-paste bash blocks, helper scripts invoked with concrete arguments, and ready-made accepted/rejected reply templates covering the common cases.

5 / 5

Workflow Clarity

A clearly sequenced 6-step loop with explicit validation checkpoints — empty-array check routes to termination, 'verify before trusting' against real code, and step 6 polling with timeout/re-run/reported-stall feedback loops for error recovery on this batch operation.

5 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

SKILL.md is a focused overview with well-signaled one-level-deep references — helper scripts in scripts/ and optional gotchas/resolution mechanics in references/extras.md, all real files enumerated in a Files section and linked inline; nothing nested deeper.

5 / 5

Total

19

/

20

Passed

Description

100%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong description: third-person voice, concrete actions, explicit 'Use when' trigger clause with quoted natural phrases, and a sharply distinct niche. Both the 'what' and 'when' are answered clearly with comprehensive trigger coverage.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists multiple concrete actions — 'Triage, verdict, and reply', 'judges each comment on its merits', 'replies inline on each thread, commits and pushes fixes, re-requests review from both bots, waits for the fresh round, and repeats' — giving comprehensive coverage of what the skill does.

5 / 5

Completeness

Explicitly answers both what (triage/verdict/reply to bot comments and iterate until clean) and when ('Use this whenever a pull request has feedback from Copilot or Greptile and the user wants those comments handled — e.g. ...') with concrete trigger phrases.

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Quotes natural user phrases directly — 'deal with the bot review comments', 'address the Copilot/Greptile feedback on my PR', 'go through the review bots', 'resolve the automated review', 'clear the AI reviewers' — covering synonyms and varied phrasings a user would actually say.

5 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Targets a clear niche — automated PR review comments from GitHub Copilot and Greptile specifically — with distinct triggers and minimal overlap risk with other skills.

5 / 5

Total

20

/

20

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
pgplex/pgconsole
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.