Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is a tight, fully executable runbook: copy-paste-ready gh api commands, concrete output templates, and clearly sequenced steps with conditional reporting. The only minor gaps are the absence of any API-failure handling and hardcoded runner counts in the example output.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is efficient and assumes competence — it provides non-obvious facts ("Runner group ID 8 is the 'macOS' group in the getditto org") and exact output formats without padding. Minor trimmable instances remain, such as the redundant "# Check macOS GHA Runners" heading nested under "Command Template" and hardcoded runner counts ("34/34") in the sample output, keeping it below anchor 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Both gh api commands with complete jq filters are copy-paste executable, and the report formats are fully specified down to the warning and clean-report variants. This matches anchor 5 ('fully executable; copy-paste ready code or commands; specific examples cover the common cases'). | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The sequence (fetch → report → optional detail) is clear with explicit conditional branches for offline runners and the all-online case, and the operation is read-only so the destructive/batch validation cap does not apply. It falls at anchor 4 rather than 5 because there is no guidance for handling API failures (auth, permissions, missing group) and the hardcoded '34' could mislead if the fleet size changes. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | This is a short, single-purpose skill with no bundle files, and all content appropriately lives inline in well-organized sections. Per the rubric's simple-skill guidance, well-organized sections with no need for external references warrant anchor 5. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |