Content
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body delivers concrete, executable guidance with a well-sequenced workflow and verification checklist. Its main weakness is mild redundancy between the section templates and the 'Example Output' illustration.
Suggestions
Trim the 'Example Output' section or fold it into one of the format examples to remove duplicated content.
Consider a brief explicit verification step (e.g. 'Preview the rendered description before posting') to reinforce the checklist.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient with concrete commands and no extraneous concept explanations, but the 'Example Output' section repeats the format templates already shown, so it could be tightened. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides executable commands (`git log main..HEAD --oneline`, `git diff main..HEAD`), concrete argument syntax, and copy-paste-ready markdown templates for every section. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clearly numbered 4-step sequence with a decision checkpoint in step 2 (skip if already complete) and a closing checklist that serves as explicit verification. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | A single-purpose skill with no bundle files, organized into well-labeled sections (Arguments, Instructions, Format, Guidelines, Checklist) that keep the overview self-contained. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |