Render the digest for one provider-research date from every report on disk, topped with authored highlight bullets; publishing is scripts/provider-watch/publish.py's job, run outside this skill
60
71%
Does it follow best practices?
Run evals on this skill
Adds up to 20 points to the overall score
View guide
Low
Low-risk findings worth noting
Fix and improve this skill with Tessl
tessl review fix ./.claude/skills/provider-research-digest/SKILL.mdRender digests/<date>.md in the reports checkout from every report carrying the date, topped with highlight bullets you author. The digest is a function of the reports on disk, not of any one research run — re-running this skill after further same-date research replaces the digest with a fresh view of the whole date. Everything stays local — this skill publishes nothing; pushing the digest and opening the digest issue are scripts/provider-watch/publish.py --finalize's job, run afterwards by whoever invoked this.
/provider-research-digest [--date YYYY-MM-DD]--date YYYY-MM-DD — the date to digest. Defaults to today.Record RUN_DATE as --date if given, else today's date (YYYY-MM-DD), and pick a scratch directory outside the repo (your session scratchpad if you have one, else mktemp -d -t provider-research-digest). The reports checkout is always ./_reports in this repo (gitignored). If it is missing, gh repo clone pipecat-ai/provider-watch-reports _reports; if it exists and has a remote, git -C _reports pull --ff-only — the digest must see every report published for the date, not a stale checkout. Stop with a clear error if no _reports/reports/*/*/<RUN_DATE>.md exists.
uv run python scripts/provider-watch/digest.py --reports _reports --date <RUN_DATE> --out <scratch>/digest-draft.mdRead the draft: it aggregates every unit's summary, PRs, changes to consider and errors for the date.
Write up to 5 highlight bullets to <scratch>/highlights.md from the draft: what a maintainer should look at first — services broken out of the box, PRs and branches worth reviewing first, long-open gaps that finally moved, providers that errored. Judge from the whole date, not from whichever units were researched most recently, and skip bullets when nothing stands out. Match the draft's conventions (unit ids and code in backticks, report paths where a pointer helps).
uv run python scripts/provider-watch/digest.py --reports _reports --date <RUN_DATE> --highlights <scratch>/highlights.md --out _reports/digests/<RUN_DATE>.mduv run python scripts/provider-watch/publish.py --date <RUN_DATE> --finalize — publishes everything on disk for the date, digest included: pushes branches, reports and the digest, and opens (or updates) the digest issue.Authorization headers, or raw API keys.publish.py — print its command instead.digest.py; author only the highlights, and do not hand-edit the rendered sections.baf1f16
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.