Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a concise, well-structured instruction skill that leads the reader from model selection through rendering choices to a verification checklist without over-explaining. Its only soft spot is that verification guidance is a checklist rather than an explicit error-recovery feedback loop.
Suggestions
Tighten the 'Build and verify' section into an explicit validate-then-fix-retry loop so errors during inspection have a clear recovery path.
Add one minimal inline HTML/SVG skeleton or concrete parameter hint to lift actionability from design guidance toward copy-paste-ready output.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and efficient throughout: no padding, no explanations of concepts Claude already knows, and every line (form selection, rendering guidance, verification checks) earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, decision-level guidance (which form for which question, specific rendering choices, an explicit verification checklist) but stays at design-instruction level rather than executable code, which is appropriate yet leaves minor gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear sequence (choose model -> choose rendering -> build and verify) with verification checkpoints in the final section, though the verify step is a checklist rather than an explicit validate-fix-retry feedback loop. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A short, single-purpose skill under 50 lines with well-organized sections and an optional one-level-deep reference to design-artifact; no monolithic walls or nested references, so it earns the simple-skill exception. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |