CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

apify-ultimate-scraper

AI-driven data extraction from 55+ Actors across all major platforms. This skill automatically selects the best Actor for your task.

28

Quality

21%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./plugins/antigravity-awesome-skills-claude/skills/apify-ultimate-scraper/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

42%Scale 1-3

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The skill provides highly actionable, executable commands and a clear workflow structure, but is severely undermined by its massive inline reference tables consuming excessive tokens. The 55+ actor listings should be offloaded to separate reference files or replaced by reliance on the search-actors command, and validation checkpoints should be integrated into the workflow steps rather than relegated to a separate error handling section.

Suggestions

Move the actor reference tables (Instagram, Facebook, TikTok, YouTube, Google Maps, Other) to a separate ACTORS_REFERENCE.md file and link to it from SKILL.md, keeping only the use-case mapping table and the search-actors command inline.

Add explicit validation checkpoints in the workflow: verify schema fetch succeeded before Step 3, validate input JSON structure before Step 4, and check run status before Step 5.

Integrate error handling into the workflow steps as inline feedback loops (e.g., 'If fetch-actor-details returns empty, verify Actor ID and retry or use search-actors') rather than listing errors in a separate section.

Remove the multi-actor workflows and follow-up suggestion tables from the main body—these could be in a separate WORKFLOWS.md file or generated dynamically based on results.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The skill is extremely verbose with massive lookup tables (55+ actors across 6 categories) that consume enormous token budget. Most of this reference data could be offloaded to separate files or handled by the search-actors command. The use-case mapping tables, multi-actor workflow tables, and follow-up suggestion tables add further bloat. Claude doesn't need all 55 actor IDs inline when there's a search command available.

1 / 3

Actionability

The skill provides fully executable bash commands for every step: searching actors, fetching schemas, and running scripts with concrete flags and formats. The commands are copy-paste ready with clear placeholder substitution patterns (ACTOR_ID, JSON_INPUT, SEARCH_KEYWORDS).

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

The 5-step workflow is clearly sequenced with a progress checklist, but it lacks explicit validation checkpoints. There's no step to verify the actor schema was fetched successfully before proceeding, no validation that the input JSON matches the schema, and no feedback loop for handling partial results or retrying failed runs. The error handling section is separate rather than integrated into the workflow steps.

2 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

This is a monolithic wall of content with no bundle files provided to offload the massive actor reference tables. The 55+ actor listings, use-case mappings, and multi-actor workflow tables should be in separate reference files. Everything is crammed into a single SKILL.md, making it extremely long and poorly organized for progressive disclosure.

1 / 3

Total

7

/

12

Passed

Description

0%Scale 1-3

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

This description is too vague and jargon-heavy to be effective for skill selection. It fails to specify concrete actions, lacks natural trigger terms users would use, provides no 'Use when' guidance, and uses insider terminology ('Actors') that wouldn't help Claude distinguish this skill from others. The description reads more like marketing copy than a functional skill selector.

Suggestions

Replace vague 'data extraction from 55+ Actors' with specific actions like 'Scrapes websites, extracts product data, crawls social media profiles, and collects search results using Apify platform actors'.

Add a 'Use when...' clause with natural trigger terms such as 'Use when the user asks to scrape a website, extract data from Amazon/Google/Instagram/Twitter, crawl web pages, or collect structured data from online platforms'.

List specific platforms or data types supported (e.g., 'e-commerce product data, social media posts, search engine results, job listings') to make the skill clearly distinguishable from generic data extraction tools.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

The description uses vague language like 'data extraction' and 'AI-driven' without listing concrete actions. '55+ Actors across all major platforms' is abstract and doesn't specify what actions are performed (e.g., scraping product listings, extracting reviews, downloading images).

1 / 3

Completeness

The 'what' is vague ('data extraction') and there is no 'when' clause or explicit trigger guidance. There's no 'Use when...' statement, which per the rubric should cap completeness at 2, but the 'what' is also too weak to merit a 2.

1 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

The description lacks natural keywords a user would say. Terms like 'Actors' and 'AI-driven' are platform-specific jargon (Apify). It doesn't include terms users would naturally use like 'scrape', 'web scraping', 'crawl', specific platform names, or data types.

1 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

'Data extraction' is extremely generic and could conflict with many other skills (PDF extraction, database queries, API data fetching, spreadsheet processing). 'All major platforms' provides no specificity about what domain this skill occupies.

1 / 3

Total

4

/

12

Passed

Validation

90%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 10 / 11 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

10

/

11

Passed

Repository
popey/claude-code-skills
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.