concise-planning

Use when a user asks for a plan for a coding task, to generate a clear, actionable, and atomic checklist.

Quality

83%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

Securityby

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Quality

Content

100%Scale 1-3

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

This is a well-crafted, concise planning skill that provides clear, actionable guidance with a concrete template. The workflow is logically sequenced, the checklist guidelines add useful constraints without over-explaining, and the content is appropriately scoped for a single-purpose skill. The only minor weakness is the somewhat boilerplate 'When to Use' and 'Limitations' sections, but they don't significantly detract from quality.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	The skill is lean and efficient. Every section serves a purpose—no unnecessary explanations of what planning is or why it matters. The template and guidelines are tight and assume Claude's competence.	3 / 3
Actionability	Provides a concrete, copy-paste-ready markdown template with specific structural requirements (6-10 atomic steps, verb-first, scope in/out). The workflow steps are specific and the checklist guidelines give clear, actionable formatting rules.	3 / 3
Workflow Clarity	The three-step workflow (Scan Context → Minimal Interaction → Generate Plan) is clearly sequenced. The plan template itself includes a validation step requirement. For a non-destructive planning skill, this level of workflow clarity is appropriate and complete.	3 / 3
Progressive Disclosure	For a simple, single-purpose skill under 50 lines with no need for external references, the content is well-organized into logical sections (Workflow, Template, Guidelines, Limitations) with clear headers and appropriate depth.	3 / 3
	Total	12 / 12 Passed

Description

67%Scale 1-3

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description has a clear 'Use when' trigger clause and communicates the core purpose, but lacks specificity in what concrete actions the skill performs beyond generating a checklist. It would benefit from more natural trigger terms and a more detailed explanation of capabilities to distinguish it from general coding assistance skills.

Suggestions

Add more specific concrete actions, e.g., 'Breaks down coding tasks into atomic steps, estimates complexity, identifies dependencies, and generates a numbered checklist'.

Expand trigger terms to include common variations users might say, such as 'implementation plan', 'task breakdown', 'steps to implement', 'todo list', or 'roadmap'.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	It names the domain ('coding task') and one action ('generate a clear, actionable, and atomic checklist'), but 'clear, actionable, and atomic' are quality adjectives rather than concrete distinct actions. It doesn't list multiple specific capabilities.	2 / 3
Completeness	It explicitly answers both 'what' (generate a clear, actionable, and atomic checklist) and 'when' (when a user asks for a plan for a coding task), with the 'Use when' clause clearly present.	3 / 3
Trigger Term Quality	Includes some natural keywords like 'plan', 'coding task', and 'checklist' that users might say, but misses common variations like 'todo list', 'implementation plan', 'task breakdown', 'steps', or 'roadmap'.	2 / 3
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	The concept of planning a coding task is somewhat specific, but 'coding task' is broad enough that it could overlap with general coding assistance skills, code review skills, or project management skills. The 'checklist' aspect adds some distinctiveness.	2 / 3
	Total	9 / 12 Passed

Validation

90%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 10 / 11 Passed

Validation for skill structure

Criteria	Description	Result
frontmatter_unknown_keys	Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata	Warning

	Total	10 / 11 Passed

Repository: popey/claude-code-skills
Path: plugins/antigravity-awesome-skills/skills/concise-planning/SKILL.md
Commit: a5a6601

Reviewed: 5 days ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.