CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

conductor-manage

Manage track lifecycle: archive, restore, delete, rename, and cleanup

33

Quality

28%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./plugins/antigravity-awesome-skills-claude/skills/conductor-manage/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

22%Scale 1-3

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

This skill is essentially a stub that defers all meaningful content to an external playbook that isn't provided. The body lacks any concrete commands, code, file format examples, or step-by-step workflows for the five operations it claims to support. While it's reasonably concise and has some structure, the near-total absence of actionable guidance makes it ineffective as a standalone skill.

Suggestions

Add concrete, executable steps for at least the most common operations (e.g., archive and delete), including specific commands or file manipulation instructions rather than abstract directives like 'Update tracks.md consistently.'

Include explicit validation checkpoints and feedback loops for destructive operations (delete, cleanup), such as 'verify backup exists before proceeding' with a concrete check command.

Provide at least a brief example of the expected conductor/ directory structure and tracks.md format so Claude knows what it's working with.

Either include the referenced `resources/implementation-playbook.md` in the bundle or inline the critical workflow details so the skill is self-sufficient for basic operations.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The content is relatively brief but includes some unnecessary sections like 'Use this skill when' / 'Do not use this skill when' that are somewhat redundant, and the Limitations section contains generic boilerplate that doesn't add value specific to this skill.

2 / 3

Actionability

The instructions are vague and abstract — 'Verify conductor/ structure,' 'Determine the operation mode,' 'Update tracks.md and metadata consistently' — with no concrete commands, code examples, file formats, or specific steps for any of the operations (archive, restore, delete, rename, cleanup).

1 / 3

Workflow Clarity

There is no clear sequence of steps for any of the multiple operations this skill covers. Destructive operations (delete, cleanup) mention confirmation but lack explicit validation checkpoints or feedback loops. The skill essentially defers all workflow detail to an external playbook.

1 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

The skill references `resources/implementation-playbook.md` for detailed workflows, which is a reasonable one-level-deep reference. However, no bundle files are provided to verify the reference exists, and the SKILL.md itself provides almost no actionable overview content — it's too thin to serve as a useful entry point before deferring to the external file.

2 / 3

Total

6

/

12

Passed

Description

35%Scale 1-3

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description lists specific actions well but suffers from critical ambiguity around the domain term 'track,' which could refer to many different things. It lacks a 'Use when...' clause, making it difficult for Claude to know when to select this skill over others. The combination of domain ambiguity and missing trigger guidance significantly reduces its effectiveness in a multi-skill environment.

Suggestions

Clarify what 'track' refers to (e.g., 'audio track', 'project track', 'Linear issue track') to eliminate domain ambiguity and reduce conflict risk.

Add a 'Use when...' clause with explicit trigger terms, e.g., 'Use when the user wants to archive, restore, delete, rename, or clean up tracks in [specific system].'

Include natural user phrases and file extensions or system names that users would mention when needing this skill.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists multiple specific concrete actions: archive, restore, delete, rename, and cleanup. These are clear, actionable verbs describing what the skill does.

3 / 3

Completeness

Describes what the skill does but completely lacks a 'Use when...' clause or any explicit trigger guidance for when Claude should select this skill. Per rubric guidelines, missing 'Use when' should cap completeness at 2, and the 'what' is also somewhat ambiguous due to unclear domain, warranting a 1.

1 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Includes relevant action keywords (archive, restore, delete, rename, cleanup) but the domain term 'track' is ambiguous—it could refer to music tracks, project tracks, issue tracks, etc. Missing natural user phrases and file type references.

2 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The term 'track' is highly ambiguous and could conflict with music management, project tracking, issue tracking, or other skills. Without domain context, this description could easily trigger for the wrong skill.

1 / 3

Total

7

/

12

Passed

Validation

90%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 10 / 11 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

10

/

11

Passed

Repository
popey/claude-code-skills
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.