CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

chronicle

Analyze Copilot session history for standup reports, usage tips, session search, and session reindexing. Use when the user asks for a standup, daily summary, usage tips, workflow recommendations, wants to search or find past sessions by keyword/file/PR, wants to reindex their session store, or asks about deleting session data.

72

Quality

88%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

An unusually actionable, well-sequenced skill body: exact SQL strings, exact output templates, and explicit error-recovery loops for every workflow. The only structural weakness is that everything — including reference material like the 90-column events schema — lives inline in a single long file with no progressive-disclosure split.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Nearly all content is non-obvious operational detail (dialect-specific SQL predicates, backend-gated filters, timeout strategies, exact output formats) with essentially no explanation of concepts Claude already knows. Minor trimming is possible — the 'VS Code Chat'/'GitHub Copilot Chat' agent_name pair is restated several times in Cost Tips and the search_index.rowid warning appears in both Search and Database Schema — which keeps it below anchor 5.

4 / 5

Actionability

Guidance is fully executable: copy-paste-ready SQL fragments ("WHERE updated_at >= datetime('now', '-1 day')", "agent_name = 'VS Code Chat'"), a complete mix-check query, exact output templates for standup and search, an exact command ID (github.copilot.sessionSync.deleteSessions), and concrete escaping rules ("it's" → "it''s") cover the common cases.

5 / 5

Workflow Clarity

Every workflow is step-numbered with explicit checkpoints and error-recovery loops: empty store → "stop. Do not fabricate a standup"; search timeout → narrow the window and never retry the same scope; improve → ask the user which recommendations to apply before editing. Delete is deliberately routed to a safe, non-destructive command, so no risky operation lacks validation.

5 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

Well-organized single file with clear sections (Workflows, Query Guidelines, Database Schema) and no nested references, but at ~350 lines with no bundle files, the shared schema reference and backend-specific cost-tips details are inlined rather than split into a references/ file — good structure with minor organization gaps, matching anchor 4 rather than the one-level-deep reference structure of anchor 5.

4 / 5

Total

18

/

20

Passed

Description

87%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong description: third-person, concrete, with an explicit and well-enumerated 'Use when' clause covering most triggers. Its only weakness is that the what-clause lists four of the seven workflows the body actually implements, omitting cost-tips and improve-instructions.

Suggestions

Add 'cost tips' (reducing token usage / Copilot spend) and 'improving agent instructions from session history' to the what-clause so the description covers all seven workflows the skill implements.

Add natural trigger synonyms for the omitted workflows, e.g. "wants to lower their Copilot spend or token usage" and "wants to improve their copilot-instructions.md or AGENTS.md".

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names the domain and four concrete actions ("standup reports, usage tips, session search, and session reindexing"), but the body defines seven workflows and the description omits cost tips and improving agent instructions — minor gaps in coverage that keep it below the comprehensive anchor 5.

4 / 5

Completeness

Explicitly answers both: a clear third-person what ("Analyze Copilot session history for standup reports, usage tips, session search, and session reindexing") and a concrete "Use when the user asks for..." trigger clause enumerating the specific user requests — exactly the anchor-5 pattern.

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Good natural-keyword coverage with synonyms ("standup, daily summary", "search or find past sessions by keyword/file/PR", "reindex their session store", "deleting session data"), but common phrasings like "cost tips", "reduce spend", or "improve my instructions" are missing, matching anchor 4 rather than 5.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

"Copilot session history" is a clear niche, and triggers like "wants to reindex their session store" and "deleting session data" are distinct to this skill, giving minimal overlap risk with other skills.

5 / 5

Total

18

/

20

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
posit-dev/positron
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.