Content
100%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The skill body is concise, actionable, and sequenced with explicit validation and feedback loops for a risky commit workflow, organized cleanly without unnecessary external references. It exemplifies the rubric's good-overall patterns.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean: terse guideline bullets and a workflow built from executable git commands, with no padding explaining what git or commits are; nearly every token earns its place, matching the lean-and-efficient anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Concrete copy-paste-ready commands appear throughout (git log --oneline -20, git diff --cached, git commit -m "<subject>" -m "<body>"), providing fully executable guidance rather than pseudocode or abstraction. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Five numbered steps are clearly sequenced with validation checkpoints: a status check that stops when the tree is clean, post-commit git status --short / git log -1 confirmation, and an explicit hook-handling feedback loop that forbids auto-amending and asks the user. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | This is a single-purpose, well-organized skill under the simple-skill threshold with no bundle files; clear Guidelines and numbered Workflow sections suffice, so progressive disclosure scores 3 per the rubric's simple-skills note. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |