Content
65%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The skill body is concise and well-sequenced for a guided creation workflow, but it leans on a hooks.md reference that is not bundled and lacks a built-in validation step. Fixing the broken reference and inlining a minimal template would lift its weakest dimensions.
Suggestions
Inline a minimal executable hook JSON template/example instead of deferring entirely to hooks.md, which is absent from the bundle — the core deliverable is currently unreachable.
Add an explicit validation/test checkpoint in the Iterate loop (e.g., validate the hook JSON against the schema, then run a dry test) rather than only suggesting the user test it.
Either bundle hooks.md under references/ or inline its template and principles so the 'Load and follow hooks.md' reference is not a navigation dead end.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence — it never explains what hooks are and keeps each section to a few focused lines, so every token earns its place. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | It gives a concrete path (.github/hooks/), specific event types (PreToolUse, SessionStart, Stop), and clear steps, but the core deliverable — a hook JSON template — is deferred to hooks.md, which is not present in the bundle, leaving key details missing. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear Extract → Clarify → Iterate sequence exists with a clarify-the-ambiguous-parts loop, but verification is only suggested to the user ('suggest ways to test it') rather than an explicit validation checkpoint built into the workflow. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is well organized into short sections, but its single external reference (hooks.md) does not resolve — there is no references/ bundle — so navigation is a dead end rather than a one-level-deep pointer. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 9 / 12 Passed |