Content
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is concise, well-structured, and presents a clear iterative workflow with an explicit checkpoint, fitting a simple instruction-only skill. Its main weakness is actionability: it delegates the concrete template and file-handling details to external materials rather than stating them in the body.
Suggestions
Add concrete specifics to the Draft step: where the .instructions.md file should be saved, its filename/location convention, and a brief outline of the template structure (or inline the key fields).
Give a one-line example of a generalized instruction derived from a user correction so the extraction step is copy-paste concrete.
State explicitly that the template and detailed principles come from `agent-customization`/`instructions.md` up front, so the single external dependency is signposted at the top rather than only at the end.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence, with no padding explaining what instructions files or conventions are; every section earns its place. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Guidance is mostly concrete (extract corrections/patterns, ask specific clarifying questions, draft and save, iterate on weak parts) but omits key specifics such as where the file is saved, its naming, and the template structure, which are deferred to external materials. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear three-step sequence (Extract, Clarify, Iterate) with an explicit feedback checkpoint ('Identify the most ambiguous or weak parts and ask') for a non-destructive, single-purpose task. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | A short (under 50 lines), single-purpose skill with no local bundle files; it is cleanly sectioned and points one level deep to `instructions.md`/`agent-customization` rather than nesting references. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |