Content
90%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
An excellent, hard-won knowledge skill: lean, highly actionable, and well-structured with concrete file paths, named functions, and validation commands. It assumes competence and rewards the reader with specific failure modes and reproduction steps; only progressive disclosure and workflow-formality are slightly below top marks.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Dense, high-signal prose that assumes Claude's competence — invariants, specific file paths, and production-bug causes with no padding about what plugins or MCP servers are; every line conveys non-obvious domain knowledge. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete executable guidance throughout — exact file paths, a copy-paste-ready Validation command block, named functions to route through, and a specific reproduction recipe; per the rubric, instruction-only skills are not penalized for lack of code when guidance is this specific. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The debugging playbook and reproduction recipe give a clear ranked sequence with validation signals, and the Validation section provides explicit checkpoints; not a 5 because the primary form is a mental-model/reference rather than a single end-to-end workflow with error-recovery feedback loops. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized into clear headers (mental model, enforcement, debugging playbook, gotchas, validation) with one-level signaled pointers to companion skills (agent-host-logs, launch); not a 5 because the skill exceeds 50 lines with no bundle files, so some inline gotcha/playbook detail could conceivably be split, though it reads cohesively. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |