Content
92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
An excellent instruction-style skill body: concrete commands, explicit validation and feedback loops at every phase, and clean one-level progressive disclosure into demo-patterns.md. The only weakness is slight redundancy between the recording phase and the Technical Reference section.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and assumes Claude's competence (git log, ffmpeg, Playwright fixtures) with every section earning its place. Minor redundancy holds it below anchor 5: the MP4 requirement and GitHub 10MB/100MB limits are stated twice (Phase 4 and Technical Reference). | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully executable guidance throughout: exact commands (npm run demo:record, npm run demo:postprocess, ffprobe/ffmpeg invocations), concrete file paths, named helpers (setupDemoLayout, humanClick, bestEffort), a worked script example, and a copy-paste-ready subagent verification prompt. Not anchor 4 territory — no meaningful gaps. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Six clearly sequenced phases with a pipeline diagram, an explicit user-approval gate before recording, a dedicated verification phase (subagent frame-extraction checks captions vs. actions), and Phase 6 back-mapping that routes each change type to the right phase. Complete feedback loops. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body stays at overview level and clearly signals a single one-level-deep reference (references/demo-patterns.md, verified to exist) at both points it is needed, plus a pointer to demo-utils.ts. No nested references and no content inlined that belongs in a separate file. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |