Content
88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-sequenced, actionable workflow with executable code, explicit validation/verification checkpoints, and feedback loops, supported by a real one-level reference file. It is concise and respects Claude's competence with only minor trimming opportunities.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Largely efficient and assumes Claude's competence (no explanation of what ffmpeg/git/Playwright are), with executable commands; minor padded passages like the extended subagent prompt block and the example script could be trimmed slightly. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides copy-paste ready, executable commands (DEMO_RECORD_VIDEO Playwright invocation, ffmpeg trim/convert with explained -ss/-t flags, ffprobe/ffmpeg frame-extraction) and concrete helper names; the demo-patterns.md reference supplies complete templates. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clearly numbered six-phase pipeline (Research → Propose Script → Iterate → Record → Verify → Iterate) with explicit feedback loops: user-approval checkpoint before recording, subagent verification step, and a Phase 6 iteration map routing changes back to the correct phase. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-structured overview with one-level-deep references to the real references/demo-patterns.md (verified present) and to demo-utils.ts; minor gap in that the main body inlines a fairly long example script and subagent prompt that could arguably live in the reference. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |