Content
92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
An excellent, highly actionable skill body: every step is executable, the workflow is clearly sequenced with explicit validation and feedback loops, and detail is correctly offloaded to a well-signaled reference file. The only flaw is minor redundancy (duplicated MP4/size-limit guidance) that slightly inflates token cost.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense with project-specific, non-inferable failure modes (the libzmq/--detached behavior, the sentinel trim frame, Playwright's separate ffmpeg) and assumes Claude's competence, but the MP4/GitHub size-limit guidance is stated twice (Phase 4 and Video Output) and a few passages could be tightened. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance is fully executable: exact commands ("npm run demo:record", "npx playwright install ffmpeg"), concrete file paths, named helper functions, and a copy-paste-ready subagent prompt with complete ffprobe/ffmpeg invocations. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Six explicitly sequenced phases (Research -> Propose -> Iterate -> Record -> Verify -> Iterate) with an approval checkpoint ("Keep presenting the updated script until the user approves"), a dedicated verification phase, and feedback loops routing each change type back to the correct phase. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body stays a workflow overview while code patterns and failure-mode rationale are appropriately split into a real, one-level-deep bundle file ("See `references/demo-patterns.md` for code patterns"), clearly signaled at both point-of-use and in the Technical Reference section. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |