Content
61%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a concise, well-structured facilitator workflow with a clear sequence and an iteration loop, but it offers only high-level guidance without executable specifics and lacks explicit validation gates for its batch migration operations.
Suggestions
Add concrete executable anchors (e.g., a sample `gh stack create` command and a `migration-status.yml` workflow snippet) so Step 2 and Step 4 are copy-paste actionable.
Insert an explicit validation checkpoint between batches in Step 4 (e.g., confirm the reporting workflow shows the prior batch migrated before creating the next batch).
Specify how to detect migration status concretely (e.g., which eslint rule or workflow output signals 'migrated') rather than leaving detection to be inferred.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and list-driven with no padding about what an ADR or gh stack is; only minor phrasing could be tightened, so it sits just below the fully-trimmed anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | References concrete artifacts and tools (eslint, jscodeshift, gh stack, migration-status.yml) but gives only high-level directives to 'author code' and 'create a skill' with no executable commands or templates, leaving guidance incomplete. | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 7-step journey and a user-feedback loop in Step 3 are present, but this is a batch operation whose fan-out (Step 4) lacks explicit validation/verification checkpoints before proceeding, capping it at 3 per the batch-operation rule. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized into a journey overview plus four numbered step sections in a single file with no nested references; sits below 5 only because some scaffolding detail could optionally live in a referenced file. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 14 / 20 Passed |