Content
73%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is exceptionally lean and well-structured, with strong progressive disclosure and a clear adoption checklist. Its weakness is actionability: the body is mostly policy ('must not', 'owns', 'escape hatches') rather than executable, copy-paste guidance for actually composing or testing a config component.
Suggestions
Add one concrete, runnable snippet showing the intended composition pattern (config component built from a named presentational component + behavior hook), not just the List usage example, to lift actionability toward copy-paste ready.
Tighten the 'Adoption surfaces' checklist into an explicit ordered workflow with a validation checkpoint (e.g., 'run matching export snapshot tests; fix before publishing the changeset') to close the feedback-loop gap.
Name the specific behavior hooks or slot mechanism entry points to call instead of referring abstractly to 'behavior hooks' and 'the slots skill', so 'build by composing' is executable rather than directional.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence, covering only non-obvious Primer-specific decisions (config vs presentational, escape boundaries, data-component ownership, changeset policy) with no padding about what components or props are. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance is concrete in principle (a runnable List example, a named escape boundary, explicit changeset rules) but the 'must/must not' items are largely policy statements rather than copy-paste executable steps, and 'build by composing presentational components and behavior hooks' lacks the actual hooks/API to call. | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The 'Adoption surfaces' section gives a clear sequenced checklist of what a public API change must include (exports, tests, stories, docs metadata, changeset), with only minor validation/checkpoint gaps since it does not explicitly state verify-before-publish feedback loops. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The 52-line body is well-organized into clearly signaled sections and points one level deep to sibling skills (modular-ds-presentational-components), contributor-docs/style.md, and the slots skill; no bundle files exist to verify, but the inline/external split is appropriate with only minor organization gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |