Content
88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is highly actionable with copy-paste commands, clear sequencing, confirmation checkpoints, and an error-recovery loop. It is mostly concise and well-structured, with only minor over-explanation and a case for splitting some detail into a reference file.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Largely lean and assumes Claude's competence, but a few narrative passages like 'Pulumi recorded the error when the operation failed, so once you know which operation it is you can read the error from that record without running anything again' could be trimmed, placing it at anchor 4 rather than 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides fully executable, copy-paste-ready commands for both update and preview event retrieval ('pulumi api .../events | jq -r ... | sed ...') plus a concrete fallback procedure with exact API paths, matching anchor 5. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear sequence (identify → confirm → read events → diagnose → fix) with explicit confirmation checkpoints ('Briefly confirm which operation you landed on') and an error-recovery feedback loop ('When a diagnostic is empty or too thin to act on... stop and tell the user'), matching anchor 5. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized into clear section headers with no nested references and self-contained content, but at ~110 lines some material (e.g., the 'If the user didn't say which operation' fallback or the API-path catalog) could be split into a reference file, so it sits at anchor 4 rather than 5. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |