Content
88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tight, executable operational guide with concrete bash workflows, explicit verification checkpoints, and error-recovery guidance for destructive patch operations. Its only gap is the absence of any progressive-disclosure reference files, which it does not strictly need.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes git competence (no explanations of what a rebase or cherry-pick is), but a few section intros like "Use when a patch should be deleted completely" and "Use when only selected hunks/files should be removed" could be trimmed, landing it just below the fully-lean 5 anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Each workflow (find owning patch, amend, remove, create, rebase) ships copy-paste-ready bash with real commands and resolved variables; common cases are covered, matching the fully-executable top anchor despite necessary context placeholders like <owning-commit-sha>. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Sequences are explicit with a dedicated "Verification Checklist" (before/after check_in), conflict-resolution feedback in the amend flow, and an "Interrupted Checkout or Rebase" recovery section, satisfying the explicit-validation-and-feedback-loops anchor for these destructive/batch operations. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Content is well-organized under clear section headers with no nested or buried references and the skill is appropriately self-contained, but it exceeds 50 lines with no one-level-deep reference files, so it does not reach the 5 anchor that emphasizes content split across signaled reference files. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |