Content
56%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body has a clear sequenced workflow and a concrete output format, but the dated baseline section bloats the skill with snapshot data that belongs in a reference file, and no step provides executable commands or MCP tool invocations. Moving the baseline out and adding concrete API/MCP calls would substantially raise quality.
Suggestions
Move the 'Verified Baseline (2026-09-18)' table into a reference file (e.g. references/baseline.md), keeping only a one-line pointer plus 're-enumerate before acting' in the body.
Add concrete executable guidance for each step, e.g. the actual MCP tool calls or pvesh/API endpoints (GET /nodes, /nodes/{node}/qemu, /nodes/{node}/lxc) instead of prose directives.
Add an explicit validation step, such as cross-checking the fresh enumeration against the stored baseline and flagging drift before declaring the topology current.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The workflow steps and output format are lean, but the 'Verified Baseline (2026-09-18)' section inlines dated, version-pinned environment detail (PVE 9.2.11, IP addresses, tailnet members, router DNS behavior, rollback snapshot name) that duplicates external docs the body itself cites; time-sensitive info outside a deprecated section is penalized, matching the 'mostly efficient but could be tightened' anchor rather than the minor-trim anchor at 4. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Steps specify the exact auth source (mcp/proxmox-mcp.json), the exact fields to collect per object, and a concrete output table, but contain no executable commands or API calls (no pvesh endpoints, no MCP tool invocations), fitting 'some concrete guidance but incomplete' rather than the mostly-executable anchor at 4. | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Eight numbered, unambiguously sequenced steps cover connect through optional store, and the read-only nature means the destructive/batch validation cap does not apply; the baseline table serves as an implicit sanity check, but there is no explicit cross-check step or error handling for failures like bad auth, matching 'clear sequence with minor validation gaps' rather than 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Sections are well-labeled, but the bundle directories are empty and the ~60-line body inlines a dated baseline/reference table that clearly belongs in a separate file (the body itself points to docs/observed-state.md and docs/network-map.md in an external repo), matching the 'content that should be separate is inline' anchor. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 13 / 20 Passed |