review-pr
Review CausalPy pull requests end-to-end by classifying PR type, checking branch freshness, mergeability, remote CI, correctness, security, tests, docs, and maintainer concerns. Use when asked to review a PR, assess a branch before merge, summarize PR risks, or request changes.
67
80%
Does it follow best practices?
Run evals on this skill
Adds up to 20 points to the overall score
View guide
Low
Low-risk findings worth noting
Fix and improve this skill with Tessl
tessl review fix ./.agents/skills/review-pr/SKILL.mdW011: Third-party content exposure detected (indirect prompt injection risk).
What this means
The skill exposes the agent to untrusted, user-generated content from public third-party sources, creating a risk of indirect prompt injection. This includes browsing arbitrary URLs, reading social media posts or forum comments, and analyzing content from unknown websites.
Why it was flagged
The required workflow uses `gh pr view`, `gh api` endpoints, and `gh pr diff` to read PR metadata, commits, reviews, issue/PR comments, and changed files from GitHub, exposing the agent to outsider-authored free text.
- Repository
- pymc-labs/CausalPy
- Commit
f94d7af
- Audited
- Security analysis
Is this your skill?
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.