Fit, summarize, plot, and interpret a chosen CausalPy experiment. Use after the causal method has been selected, including when configuring PyMC/sklearn models and scale-aware custom priors.
91%
Does it follow best practices?
Run evals on this skill
Adds up to 20 points to the overall score
Passed
No findings from the security scan
Use this skill when the CausalPy experiment class is already known or has just been selected by choosing-causalpy-methods. This skill is for execution: preparing data, instantiating the experiment, choosing a model backend, setting sane priors, inspecting outputs, plotting, and communicating results.
DataFrame with the data layout required by the chosen experiment.sample_kwargs, optional prior_sample_kwargs, and scale-aware priors when predictors or outcomes are not standardized.fit(), which returns the fitted experiment (exp = cp.InterruptedTimeSeries(...).fit()).exp.sample_prior_predictive() (uses prior_sample_kwargs from the model, default 500 draws), then exp.plot(group="prior") and exp.effect_summary(group="prior") — under a neutral prior, P(effect > 0) should sit near 0.5. Revise priors by assigning a fresh model (exp.model = cp.pymc_models.LinearRegression(priors={...})); assignment resets all results.summary(), effect_summary(), print_coefficients(), and plot() only after fit(); results live on exp.result and exp.prior_result, and read methods raise GroupNotSampledException naming the missing call when a phase has not run.cp.Pipeline, cp.EstimateEffect, and cp.SensitivityAnalysis when robustness matters.cp.pymc_models.LinearRegression, configure priors for beta and the observation noise inside y_hat.WeightedSumFitter, SoftmaxWeightedSumFitter, and SyntheticDifferenceInDifferencesWeightFitter.PropensityScore, standardize continuous confounders or use coefficient priors that imply plausible log-odds shifts.InstrumentalVariableRegression, priors are passed at the experiment level through priors=... and should reflect the scale of both the treatment-stage and outcome-stage regressions.experiment.summary(): Prints a method-specific summary where implemented.experiment.effect_summary(): Returns a decision-ready structured effect summary where implemented.experiment.plot(): Visualizes fitted values, counterfactuals, effects, or diagnostics where implemented.experiment.print_coefficients(): Shows model coefficients for model-backed experiments.result = cp.Pipeline(...).run(): Runs estimation, sensitivity checks, and report generation as a reproducible workflow.InversePropensityWeighting.plot() is intentionally a stub. Use plot_ate() and plot_balance_ecdf() instead.InversePropensityWeighting.effect_summary() is not implemented. Inspect ATE draws, overlap, balance, and weight stability instead.InstrumentalVariable.plot(), summary(), and effect_summary() are not implemented, so inspect model outputs and first-stage/second-stage diagnostics directly.PanelRegression.effect_summary() is not implemented because panel fixed-effects models report coefficient-level estimates rather than time-window impacts. Use summary(), print_coefficients(), and plot() or plot_coefficients().pymc-labs/CausalPy
59450d3
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.